I've noticed something rather disturbing about myself lately. It would seem that the older I get, the less passionate I have become regarding my political affiliation. At this point, I don't even know if I am planning on
voting, let alone regale you with a heated political debate on why my particular position is, indeed, the only just and correct position. I am hesitant to attribute this phenomenon to age or wisdom, because it seems that the older I become, the less I
actually know. If I don't have children soon, merely to gain the benefit of going through the American school system again, I may become a blathering idiot by the time I'm thirty.
This apathetic attitude towards political institutions and the state of the American government is not a situation which can be solely attributed to myself. More and more these days, people are switching political discussions for popular culture topics. Water cooler discussions are more likely to center around the goings on of some drunk starlet, rather than the hard issues which can effect our state of livelihood as Americans.
Televisions are being changed from news programs to sitcoms. When the commander and chief controls the airways and interrupts our "must see" television viewing to relay a statement to the people he has sworn to serve and lead, we groan and reach for the remote.
It has been said that more people are voting for American Idol than in the last presidential election.
It hasn't always been this way, however. When my father was a child and the President made a statement, the world payed attention. Homes which were fortunate enough to own a television sat silently and attentively to process and absorb what our Commander and Chief had to say. Those who didn't gathered around the radio in the same fashion. People
cared back then. People were
concerned, and it was considered an
obligation as an American rather than an inconvenience as a consumer to educate yourself on the state of the union.
This was also before America became as industrialized as we are today.
C. Wright Mills, in 1956,
predicted this detached attitude towards governmental affairs. He thought, and rightly so, that as America traded their blue collars for white, we would become less concerned with the goings-on of the political system. Once we stopped working with our hands to create something and began pushing paperwork in a bull-pen all day long, we would become more internally motivated, focusing more attention and energy on our weekend plans than we do on the state of our country. As a result, the powers that be would eventually gain a "free hand" in regards to decision making and political prowess. Eventually, America would be controlled by three parties: the head of the military, the head of the judicial system, and the CEO's of big business.
It seems only fitting, then, that politicians resort to any means necessary to pique the publics interest. Even if it means doing this:
7 comments:
"Once we stopped working with our hands to create something and began pushing paperwork in a bull-pen all day long, we would become more internally motivated, focusing more attention and energy on our weekend plans than we do on the state of our country."
In a way, this is a good thing. I feel the freedom to live our lives as we see fit, and focus our energy as we see fit, is part of the overall goal of America, the pursuit of happiness, individual freedoms.
I pay some attention to world events, and the state of the union, but barely. There is little, or nothing I can do, short of actively getting involved in a life of politics.
When you say people cared back then, I equate it more with an ignorance is bliss attitude. With the information overload of today's society, not only do we not need to listen to the president directly, we also have access to information that is more accurate, more unbiased. Do I really believe a word our 'president' says nowadays? It's become so that I can only take everything a politician says with a grain of salt, knowing that his main focus is appeasement, so that he'll get reelected.
I'm unsure if i'm going to vote in 2008, and not because I don't care about the outcome. I don't believe I can choose between two(and that there are only two is the biggest reason I don't want to vote) candidates based on the rehearsed information they throw out there in campaigns and debates.
Maybe I just don't look, but what would be simple enough to me, is a week before the election if there was published in the newspaper, a list of every bill and law that a candidate voted for, and how. That's the only true way I can judge on what they believe in. However, this only works if the candidate is currently in a lower office.
I know I despise Hillary, (and I have no recollection of '92, or anything about country music) just from the junk it seems she's spewing lately, and because I know how she feels about video games and Grand Theft Auto, and the freedom to play them.
Blech. I hate all politicians just because of what they end up becoming in order to get where they are. This whole system is screwed up and no one is doing anything about it. I am in the same vote. Who and How am I going to vote? I don't know. But I will absolutely vote. At least so I can trash talk and back it up.
The thing is, my vote doesn't count. (Presidentiallly) I can vote for whoever the hell I want, but my vote(or rather, the elector who votes for me) is going to vote for the democratic candidate. That's just how it is in New York. So where's my motivation to vote? Whether I do or not, my elector is going to do the same thing.
I think most will fall for the campaign that Clinton is running.. you have a point about belittling men, but trendy "on the voter's level" commercials will win votes. The majority of the public falls for most advertising.
I think more people vote for American Idol because you don't have to be 18 to vote for that. And you know how many teenyboppers are out there.
That Hilary Clinton video...wow.
First woman president vs First black president? That's a toughie. If a black woman ran then she'd win my a landslide. Assuming democrats outnumber republicans.
You didn't like Hillary's video? I thought it was funny. I don't think it's disrespectful of the President (I'm also a big fan of Bill Clinton). Taking off on one of my comments on your skatboarding/police blog, I like it when our public officials remember that they're Public SERVANTS. I want the Office of the President respected, but not in an imperial way.
All that being said, I'm not sure I'm a Hillary fan. I'm becoming more impressed with Obama, but it's still early in the campaign and I'm still undecided.
Last point. That your blog is discussing political apathy is a great sign. I think apathy is actually a sign of success for our political system, that it's a sign that most of our citizens are reasonably contented with the political system and their lives. There will always be a lot of people in our nation that are uninformed or ill-informed. But it's not hard to find good political debate if you want to look just a little.
Another great post!
--David H.
I love the Clinton add. They can do one when she is in office, fat from eating italian food, banging her goomah, and doing business at the Badda Bing.
I like Obama, I like his stands on the environment and am hoping that his sincerity is honest.
Post a Comment